Webb5 juni 2024 · The law firm of Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP (the “Firm”) represented R. Scott Appling (“Appling”) in business litigation. Appling fell behind in payment of his legal bills, and the Firm... Webb3 juli 2024 · Mr. Scott Appling hired a law firm – Lamar, Archer & Cofrin LLP (Lamar) – to represent him in business litigation. After Appling fell behind on his legal bills (more than $60,000), Lamar threatened to withdraw as counsel. Appling told Lamar that he was expecting a $100,000 tax refund and would use such refund to pay Lamar.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
WebbSince its founding in 1982, Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP has represented clients in complex civil litigation and commercial real estate. Top rated, "AV" rated by Martindale … Webb4 juni 2024 · On June 4, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. Appling, No. 16-1215, holding that a statement about a single asset can be a “statement respecting the debtor’s financial condition” under section 523 (a) (2) of the Bankruptcy Code. au 通話明細サービス 無料
Put it in Writing: Lamar, Archer, Cofrin, LLP v. Appling and the …
Webb10 apr. 2024 · This case arises from a dispute between Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP, an Atlanta law firm, and one of its former clients, R. Scott Appling. Like many bankruptcy disputes, this one involves questionable financial and strategic choices by both parties. Webb17 apr. 2024 · Brief of petitioner Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP filed. Feb 26 2024: Joint appendix filed. Mar 05 2024: Brief amicus curiae of National Federation of Independent … WebbRespondent R. Scott Appling hired petitioner Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP (Lamar), a law firm, to represent him in a business litigation. Appling fell behind on his legal bills, and … 勉強 嫌い